Some Iraqi media outlets said that Maliki has received a letter from Sistani’s office through mediators warning him against running for a third mandate. Sheikh Bashir al-Nujaifi, one of the four clerics coordinating with Sistani, spoke against Maliki's third mandate, considering that Iraq will not rise if Maliki remained in office. He called on Iraqi voters to dismiss him through elections. Al-Monitor verified the authenticity of this statement with circles close to his office.
What Iraqis are drawing off these stances is that Sistani has been highly dissatisfied with the performance of Maliki’s government throughout his rule, and that he is explicitly calling for a comprehensive change in the political sphere through the elections.
What Sistani is doing is considered a tough stance, characterized by wisdom, as he is drawing the prospective lines of the Iraqi political system through orienting Iraqis into making the right decision in the elections and developing their general political performance without directly interfering.
This is what distinguishes Sistani’s work from the concept of velayat-e faqih, and makes his project democratic and civil.
What Sistani is saying right, why have the Iraq people vote for Al-maliki, he has not got any improvement for Iraq through security or by economic growth
Ok.
Give me an alternative quality leader?
Dear Editor,
This gentleman is an Iranian "God bless him". If he want to give an advice he should give his holy advice to his country men and women.